|
2009 Main Line Layout
|
|
12-09-2011, 09:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: 2009 Main Line Layout
hi,
When carrying out headway calcs for a non-stopping train following a stopper, could someone explain how the additional time equates to the Textra = Tdwell + 0.5(Braking time + acceleration time)? How is the 0.5(Braking time + acceleration time) portion derived? I had a go at deriving it using Newton's laws and substitiution but can't get my head around it! |
|||
|
12-09-2011, 10:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: 2009 Main Line Layout
Hi
You can prove it using the equations of motion - the key trick being to eliminate the distance taken to accelerate/ decelerate, which you don't know or want to know! It's easier to do it in words: Under constant acceleration, the mean velocity during a period of accn from 0 to V or decn from V to 0 will be V/2. Therefore, it will take exactly twice as long to cover the same distance, during braking or acceleration, compared to going at full speed. from equations of motion, time to accelerate = v/a, hence extra time taken to accelerate = v/2a. This effect is repeated for both the deceleration and acceleration phases, hence Textra = 0.5 * (decn time + accn time) + Tdwell You can also demonstrate this using a velocity-time graph, the area under this graph is the distance travelled. Comparing graphs for constant speed and station stopping, the difference in area is V * (0.5 * (decn time + accn time) + Tdwell) and hence 0.5 * (decn time + accn time) + Tdwell is extra time taken to cover the same distance. hope this helps Reuben |
|||
|
12-09-2011, 05:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: 2010 Q9 Degraded working at mechanical signalbox
Thanks for your help
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)



